Sunday, June 24, 2012
apocaloptimism
Saturday, June 23, 2012
this is the post that provoked the previous post
"In the 1970s and '80s, it was just plain straight-up lies, as bald-faced and cynical as can be, from clean-cut looking kids on university commons-areas, behind the "information-tables" of "student groups," such as "Jewish Student Board," "Hillel Students," "Campus Organization For Israel," etc. It was my first encounter with really lavish and shameless lying. In the '70s, so close on the heels of the Civil Rights Movement (which had not yet been neutered by toxic infusions of anti-Arab racism, by "progressive" Zionists), those little liars actually would insist that Israel was never meant to be an expressly "Jewish" state - this was forced on them by Arab belligerence and anti-Semitism. It was so obvious THEN, that any special notion for Jews would be unacceptably racist. But that's just a sample - there was no end to it. I spent my first five naive years of activism trying to find any documents that would "prove" that the title of Herzl's book "The Jewish State" should be taken seriously - and when I found the Churchill White Paper of 1922 and the Report by the King-Crane Commission, 1919, I thought Zionism was over, since these documents leave no doubt about violent racist intentions. And a strict anti-racist emphasis in conflicts with Zionists is STILL the only way - and an easy way - to defeat them, but, by the mid-'80s, the principles of egalitarianism were so eroded by Zionist dodges and obfuscations, they became invisible - and even the most supposedly staunch egalitarians simple could not process the fact that all their "egalitarian" Zionist, blues-loving friends and lovers were simply lying as fast as they could talk. But now it's different. The Zionist sayanim or hasbarim can't tell flat lies any more, so they now operate by posing as anti-Zionist or as simply confused, doing their best to make internet discussions seem inconclusive. The only way to oppose them is to never let them shift the subject into historical quibbles (NOTHING that happened yesterday can make ethnic prejudice viable today) or rhetorical baiting. The Zionists enjoy saying preposterous and insulting things, to sucker us into exposing the nonsense - a hopeless endeavor when they own the universal reservoir of lies. It's essential to always return instantly to the racism problem, pointing out that those who try to dodge the egalitarian arguments are simply raising their hands and declaring their racism - certainly no need to counter the dodges. Everything they say is rooted in racism; the point is to see how it is. "Jewish self-determination," for example is a declaration of extreme racist doctrine, since "self-determination" is a right of indigenous populations to govern themselves WITHOUT reference or bias based on ethnicity or religion - and the moment one declares a human right to live in a place where one's ethnicity or religion predominates, one has tried to legitimize all the worst horrors of racist conquest. That one-time favorite Zionist argument is rarely heard these days. I have attended several "peace and justice" "dialogues" between "Palestinians" and "Israelis" wherein every argument used by the Israelis boiled down to simply proving that Jews are better than Arabs, yet no one among the "Palestinians" or moderators or audience even NOTICED - as most progressives would surely have done in the 1970s - and all comments were neatly required to be withheld until the "question and answer" period afterwards, and the savvy, old-school equal-rights activists somehow never got called on afterwards, or the meeting suddenly ran "out of time" just in the nick of time. Realize what efforts the Zionists make to keep their fatal flaw out of the spotlight, with countless authoritative "leftists" and "anti-Zionists" constantly "criticizing Israel" very "courageously" - and all the more "credibly" if they're "Jewish" - while these people mainly talk in elaborate flamboyant detail about everything OTHER than the one point that matters: the bleeping obvious racist violence of forcing ANY expressly "Jewish" identity into even a single square-inch of the Middle East or anywhere. See it: all the elaborate espionage and "intelligence" and top-secret security required for a nuclear-weapons program and all these assassinations come to NOTHING, if the whole point of Zionism is simply recognized as overtly racist. It's an extremely difficult public-relations challenge, and it is the Zionists' TOP PRIORITY. Yet there is one easy way to recognize who is really with us: they will emphasize the world's need to simply reject overt racism as most of its population means to do. Those who fail at this don't need to be judged as to whether they're Zionist implants or just silly: the wrong is the same; no psychoanalysis of motivation required. And those who mean well, but are emerging from the mire of Zionist psy-ops need to be firmly guided to the only question that matters: Do you or do you not audibly object to any and all forms of ethnic or religious prejudice by anyone in the Israel-Palestine conflict - the same as everywhere else? A "Yes" by a significant portion of the world's population means a swift end of the "Jewish" state. A "Yes, of course, but.." is a declaration of racist violence." by Dave Kersting
"In the 1970s and '80s, it was just plain straight-up lies, as bald-faced and cynical as can be, from clean-cut looking kids on university commons-areas, behind the "information-tables" of "student groups," such as "Jewish Student Board," "Hillel Students," "Campus Organization For Israel," etc. It was my first encounter with really lavish and shameless lying. In the '70s, so close on the heels of the Civil Rights Movement (which had not yet been neutered by toxic infusions of anti-Arab racism, by "progressive" Zionists), those little liars actually would insist that Israel was never meant to be an expressly "Jewish" state - this was forced on them by Arab belligerence and anti-Semitism. It was so obvious THEN, that any special notion for Jews would be unacceptably racist. But that's just a sample - there was no end to it. I spent my first five naive years of activism trying to find any documents that would "prove" that the title of Herzl's book "The Jewish State" should be taken seriously - and when I found the Churchill White Paper of 1922 and the Report by the King-Crane Commission, 1919, I thought Zionism was over, since these documents leave no doubt about violent racist intentions. And a strict anti-racist emphasis in conflicts with Zionists is STILL the only way - and an easy way - to defeat them, but, by the mid-'80s, the principles of egalitarianism were so eroded by Zionist dodges and obfuscations, they became invisible - and even the most supposedly staunch egalitarians simple could not process the fact that all their "egalitarian" Zionist, blues-loving friends and lovers were simply lying as fast as they could talk. But now it's different. The Zionist sayanim or hasbarim can't tell flat lies any more, so they now operate by posing as anti-Zionist or as simply confused, doing their best to make internet discussions seem inconclusive. The only way to oppose them is to never let them shift the subject into historical quibbles (NOTHING that happened yesterday can make ethnic prejudice viable today) or rhetorical baiting. The Zionists enjoy saying preposterous and insulting things, to sucker us into exposing the nonsense - a hopeless endeavor when they own the universal reservoir of lies. It's essential to always return instantly to the racism problem, pointing out that those who try to dodge the egalitarian arguments are simply raising their hands and declaring their racism - certainly no need to counter the dodges. Everything they say is rooted in racism; the point is to see how it is. "Jewish self-determination," for example is a declaration of extreme racist doctrine, since "self-determination" is a right of indigenous populations to govern themselves WITHOUT reference or bias based on ethnicity or religion - and the moment one declares a human right to live in a place where one's ethnicity or religion predominates, one has tried to legitimize all the worst horrors of racist conquest. That one-time favorite Zionist argument is rarely heard these days. I have attended several "peace and justice" "dialogues" between "Palestinians" and "Israelis" wherein every argument used by the Israelis boiled down to simply proving that Jews are better than Arabs, yet no one among the "Palestinians" or moderators or audience even NOTICED - as most progressives would surely have done in the 1970s - and all comments were neatly required to be withheld until the "question and answer" period afterwards, and the savvy, old-school equal-rights activists somehow never got called on afterwards, or the meeting suddenly ran "out of time" just in the nick of time. Realize what efforts the Zionists make to keep their fatal flaw out of the spotlight, with countless authoritative "leftists" and "anti-Zionists" constantly "criticizing Israel" very "courageously" - and all the more "credibly" if they're "Jewish" - while these people mainly talk in elaborate flamboyant detail about everything OTHER than the one point that matters: the bleeping obvious racist violence of forcing ANY expressly "Jewish" identity into even a single square-inch of the Middle East or anywhere. See it: all the elaborate espionage and "intelligence" and top-secret security required for a nuclear-weapons program and all these assassinations come to NOTHING, if the whole point of Zionism is simply recognized as overtly racist. It's an extremely difficult public-relations challenge, and it is the Zionists' TOP PRIORITY. Yet there is one easy way to recognize who is really with us: they will emphasize the world's need to simply reject overt racism as most of its population means to do. Those who fail at this don't need to be judged as to whether they're Zionist implants or just silly: the wrong is the same; no psychoanalysis of motivation required. And those who mean well, but are emerging from the mire of Zionist psy-ops need to be firmly guided to the only question that matters: Do you or do you not audibly object to any and all forms of ethnic or religious prejudice by anyone in the Israel-Palestine conflict - the same as everywhere else? A "Yes" by a significant portion of the world's population means a swift end of the "Jewish" state. A "Yes, of course, but.." is a declaration of racist violence." by Dave Kersting
relflecting upon my prejudice
Thank you to those who make me step back and look at myself in the
back drop of the bigger picture. I don’t know how you do it, but you
seem to always reveal a treasure.
I find myself wondering how anti-Israel sentiment can be racist if Jewishness is not a race? How can Israeli people be a race if the requirement for entry is to be Jewish, not a ‘race’? Yet I see within Israel, a racist attitude towards non-white Jews. My own bigotry is not racial, rather it is spiritual.
I recognize my rejection of the bigotry of their religious ideals of superiority and right to exist above all religions. I acknowledge that I am prejudiced against their racism and bigotry towards all non-white Jews.
I find myself wondering how anti-Israel sentiment can be racist if Jewishness is not a race? How can Israeli people be a race if the requirement for entry is to be Jewish, not a ‘race’? Yet I see within Israel, a racist attitude towards non-white Jews. My own bigotry is not racial, rather it is spiritual.
I recognize my rejection of the bigotry of their religious ideals of superiority and right to exist above all religions. I acknowledge that I am prejudiced against their racism and bigotry towards all non-white Jews.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)